‘Under the Gunn’ tries to capture ‘Project Runway’ attention, but ultimately fails

This blog originally appeared on elkharttruth.com on April 17, 2014. The latest season of “Project Runway” premieres Aug. 17.

Spinoffs have become a huge part of TV culture, especially in the last year or two.

Whether it’s because it’s a way to capitalize on what’s already good or just a lack of original ideas, we are stuck with spinoffs.

One such spinoff is “Under the Gunn,” a Lifetime reality competition that’s a spinoff of the hit design show, “Project Runway,” hosted by Heidi Klum.

“Under the Gunn,” which aired its season finale April 10, was supposed to center around “Project Runway” mentor Tim Gunn, the beloved fashion instructor and mentor who is a big component of the success of “Project Runway.”

Many people voiced their excitement about the show on social media, mainly because it was all about Gunn.

But ultimately, that was not what “Under the Gunn” turned out to be.

Yes, it was a design competition. It had the usual drama, mess ups and down-to-the-wire moments. But Gunn didn’t mentor that much during the show’s 13-episode run.

Gunn served as a host and a mentor to the three true mentors of the show: Anya Ayoung-Chee, Mondo Guerra and Nick Verreos.

The trio of “Project Runway” alumni were the ones who actually mentored the contestants. They were the ones who walked around asking designing questions and pushing the designers to the next level.

The idea was that once all of one mentor’s contestants were eliminated, the mentor would be eliminated as well. But, predictably, each mentor was represented in the finale. The last four standing were: Asha Daniels (Mondo), Shan Keith Oliver (Anya), Sam Donovan (Mondo) and Oscar Garcia-Lopez (Nick), who was named the winner by judges Jen Rade, Rachel Roy and Zanna Roberts Rassi. Heidi Klum and actor Neil Patrick Harris were guest judges for the finale episode, which saw each designer complete a mini collection.

While viewers got to watch Anya, Mondo and Nick grow as mentors, I wanted to see Gunn mentoring more. That’s what he does on “Project Runway,” and that’s why people love him.

Gunn has a flair for mentoring. It’s his gift. He’s tough, but kind. He makes people question their work, he makes people laugh and he makes designers fulfill their potential.

His signature fashion, critiques and motto, “Make it work,” are what makes “Project Runway” so fun to watch.

And that was missing on “Under the Gunn.”

It’s not that Gunn was a bad host. It’s just this: He’s a better, more entertaining mentor.

SYTYCD vs. World of Dance: Which is better?

Don’t mess with what works. Or at least, not too much.

Jennifer Lopez brought her Fly Girl skills back to TV by starting the reality show “World of Dance” on NBC…12 years after “So You Think You Can Dance” premiered on Fox.

Let’s compare the two shows:

The host

SYTYCD’s Cat Deeley vs. WOD’s Jenna Dewan Tatum

Here’s the thing. Dewan Tatum actually is a dancer (“Step Up” forever!). Deeley is not. We’re talking zero experience.

Dewan Tatum acts as host and mentor on WOD as part of the show’s structure. She can give real feedback to the dancers.

But she’s a bit awkward as a host. She hasn’t gotten her footing yet. I fully believe she can, but her banter is more mechanical than natural right now.

Deeley may not know dance, but she has a natural flair for hosting. She has her lovable quotes (“Here are your…judges!”). And she banters well among the dancers, judges and audience.

Edge: SYTYCD

Judges

Nigel Lythgoe, Mary Murphy and more vs. Jennifer Lopez, Ne-Yo and Derek Hough

Both sets of judges have a good amount of knowledge. Not all do; SYTYCD usually brings in a guest judge whose dance knowledge is hit or miss.

Murphy and Lythgoe have chemistry thanks to years of working together. I could take or leave Murphy and her Hot Tamale Train, but I know some viewers eat it up.

I appreciate the range WOD’s judges give. They have experience in more styles, I believe, than SYTYCD’s mainstays. But SYTYCD judges have more range in how they critique performances.

Edge: SYTYCD (ever so slightly)

Scoring

On SYTYCD, most of the scoring is based on viewer votes. In the beginning, the judges choose who goes home from the bottom three after they dance for their life.

On WOD, the judges score based on five categories for a score out of 100. The higher scoring dancer/group moves on.

As a dancer, I appreciate WOD’s method. On SYTYCD, many times a better dancer would get kicked off because they somehow didn’t get enough votes, which always frustrated me.

The scoring on WOD seems to be more fair because it’s more based on technique and ability.

Edge: WOD

I’ll give “World of Dance” credit, it’s definitely better than some other reality dance TV shows. In another season or two, as it gains its footing, I think it could be as good as “SYTYCD.” I’ll keep watching both for now.

“SYTYCD” airs Mondays, while “World of Dance” airs Tuesdays until Aug. 8, which is the first season finale.